乙醇產業蓬勃發展 將造成美國水資源壓力摘譯自2007年10月10日ENS美國,華盛頓特區報導;吳萃慧編譯;蔡麗伶審校
撰寫報告的委員表示,一些潛在的衝擊持續升高對生長玉米與煉製乙醇區域的地下蓄水層的環境壓力。這些衝擊包括高濃度的氮源將以殺蟲劑及肥料形式滲入地下水,同時生產所釋出的污染也會進入溪流及河川。 以愛荷華大學工程學教授史諾博士(Dr. Jerald Schnoor)為首的6人委員會檢視了幾項政策方案,並在其中發現了可將生質燃料生產對水資源影響降至最低的新型農業技術與科技。 最近的油價上升與補貼政策,使玉米乙醇的生產達到戲劇性的擴展,並且十分可能在未來20年間繼續蓬勃發展。 因為能源自給自足的程度攸關美國重大國家利益,2007年布希總統的國情咨文裡還表示將在2017年之前生產350億加侖(約合1325億公升)的乙醇,這大約是美國運輸用液體燃料需求量的15%。 委員會發現,在農業不發達或特別是在乾旱的區域進行農業轉型生產玉米與生質燃料作物,將會改變現有的灌溉作業方式,並將對美國很多地方造成水資源壓力。 U.S. Water Under Pressure as Ethanol Production Soars
Increased pressure on local aquifers used to grow and refine corn into ethanol, high levels of nitrogen in groundwater from pesticides and fertilizers, and runoff pollution in streams and rivers are a few of the potential impacts, said the committee that wrote the report. Chaired by Dr. Jerald Schnoor, a professor of engineering at the University of Iowa, the six member committee examined policy options and identified opportunities for new agricultural techniques and technologies to help minimize effects of biofuel production on water resources. Recent increases in oil prices together with subsidy policies have led to a dramatic expansion in corn ethanol production and high interest in further expansion over the next decade. Because of strong national interest in greater energy independence, in this year's State of the Union address, President George W. Bush called for the production of 35 billion gallons of ethanol by 2017, which would equal about 15 percent of the U.S. liquid transportation fuels. The committee found that agricultural shifts to growing corn and expanding biofuel crops into regions with little agriculture, especially dry areas, could change current irrigation practices and greatly increase pressure on water resources in many parts of the United States. 全文及圖片詳見ENS 點閱數: 994 | email this page
發表時間: 週一, 2007-10-15 05:55 提交人: 楊琇晴
發表新評論 |
編輯室小啟瀏覽存檔google 提供的廣告Navigation |
|
powered by drupal
|
我覺得環保的事也真的很弔詭。
生長玉米與煉製乙醇,生質能源很好。
不像石油的諸多缺點而能減少碳排放量,以及對石油依賴。
但是當經濟作物大規模生產,也會影響到水資源,
尤其"這些衝擊包括高濃度的氮源將以殺蟲劑及肥料形式滲入地下水",這不是另一種嚴重傷害嗎?
我們豈不是上被大氣暖化或者下被化學毒料的水源所害?
不過寫到這裏我就知道都是分立的思考政策使然。
如果配套上是鼓勵整個生產過程的接近自然農法,那就不會有這些問題囉!
而土地是否全部被運用來單一作物生產的影響性也是要被評估的。