環境新聞回顧
台灣國際

崔媽媽電子報

【設為首頁】

 

[生活的未來-環境與經濟]
每週評論:拯救我們的世界  Healing Our World: Weekly Comment

這不是選擇魚或農場的問題 (上)

It's Not About Choosing Fish or
 Farms


作者:傑奇•艾倫•朱利安諾 博士

對世界的沮喪感日增
我在寂寥的夜裡醒來
擔心著我的生活和孩子的未來,
走到美麗的木頭鴨休憩、與大蒼鷺覓食的水邊躺下。
不必杞人憂天,我融入萬物的平和。
我融入水中的寂靜。
感覺天上有一群無視白晝掩蓋的星星,
正靜靜等待黑夜的來臨,再次綻放光芒。
這一刻,我在世界的恩典中放鬆,感到自由。
-- 威德爾•貝利

  住在美國奧勒岡州克拉瑪斯瀑布市(Klamath Falls, Oregon)的農民,長久以來一直抗議美國開墾局把克拉瑪斯盆地計劃中的大部分水源,分配給上克拉瑪斯湖(Upper Klamath Lake)中的瀕臨絕種或受威脅魚類。農民認為美國政府把魚看的比人還要重要,整個國家幾乎都被環保人士掌控了。

  如果進一步檢視這些農民的說法,這個衝突所揭示的是更嚴重的問題:對於已失去永續性、導致環境毀滅和社會功能失調的農耕方式,我們該怎麼辦?

  自從美國鼓勵採用化學製品增加農業產量,大公司從二次大戰以後就開始出現由財團所經營的農產品公司,而這造成資源的高度浪費,以及對生態系統毀滅性的影響。

  愛荷華州的愛莫思(Ames, Iowa)附近的小型農場(照片提供 史考特•鮑爾,美國農業部)

  以前的農業程序比較簡單,和週遭環境之間的互動也較為和諧。數千年來,肥沃的田地生長出蔬菜五穀,供人類與動物食用;產出的廢棄物則回歸土壤,土地重新播種,很多是來自於上一季作物所遺留的種子,而循環由此再次開始。

  但自從20世紀開始,一種新的模式浮現:即寇克派區克•薩利在《人類規模》(Human Scale)一書當中所描述的「好大狂」(bigness)傾向。各行各業篤信越大越好,尤其是農業,人們要過度負荷的土壤產出巨大的收穫量。

  越來越不肥沃的土壤被施以合成肥料,這通常用的是石化工業的副產品;接著田地施灑殺蟲劑和除草劑,而化學製品會帶走水份,因此要再灌以大量的水,好補充土壤的溼度。種出來的食物又要經過重重加工,再運送到遠方去賣,而大部分養分在製程中流失。食品消費者與農場動物所產生的廢棄物也不再施用在土地上,反而是用水沖掉、被焚燒成為空氣中的灰塵,或排入河川海洋。

  這些土地的生產力下降了,薩利形容這個新循環為:「破碎的、…能源密集的、高度消耗性,以及受到毒害的循環。」

  新的農業模式-現在被稱為農產品企業(agribusiness)-並不適合鄉村的家庭式農場。事實上,由大公司所經營的企業化農場,在這種必須仰賴化學製品的美國新類型農業上佔盡便宜。

  田地技術人員維多•瓦拉德斯操作著有罩式噴灑機,在種植玉米苗的列與列之間施灑除草劑(照片提供 傑克•狄金嘉,美國農業部)

  面積數百英畝的大型農場,在過去50年內數目增加超過5倍,而同時,超過3百萬個家庭式農場已經消失。
這種徹底的改變導致了重大的環境及社會後果。

  在密蘇里州考察三個禮拜以後,密蘇里州農村危機中心(Missouri Rural Crisis Center)的行政主管羅傑•愛利森,在1998年在美國農業部作證時說道:「若以造成魚類及溪流生命死亡來計算環境惡化的程度,兩家企業化的豬隻屠宰工廠比過去10年中所有農業所造成的破壞力還要大。」

  從1940年到1975年,美國農產輸出增加了90%,肥料使用卻增加了900%。

  企業化農場大量使用燃燒化石燃料的機器,以及過度使用高價能源,結果使得農產品的價格非常不穩定,且節節高漲。


By Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D.

When despair for the world grows in me
and I wake in the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children's lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting with their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.
-- Wendell Berry

Farmers in Klamath Falls, Oregon have been protesting the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's decision to allocate almost all the water in the Klamath Basin Project to protect the endangered or threatened fish Upper Klamath Lake. The farmers claim that the U.S. government is putting fish before people and that environmentalists have a stranglehold on the nation.

Upon closer examination, this conflict reveals a more serious issue - what do we do about farming practices that are not sustainable and are resulting in environmental destruction and societal dysfunction? 

Farming practices that have been adopted since the U.S. encouraged a shift to chemical intensive, corporate owned agribusiness after World War II that is highly wasteful of resources and destructive of ecosystems.

Small farm near Ames, Iowa (Photo by Scott Bauer courtesy U.S. Dept. Agriculture)

Farming used to be a rather straightforward process that was done in relative harmony with the surrounding environs. For thousands of years, fertile fields produced vegetables and grains that were eaten by humans and animals. The resulting waste products were put into the soil, the land was re-seeded, often with seeds from last season's crop, and the cycle began again.

But beginning in the 20th century, a new pattern emerged, described by Kirkpatrick Sale, in his book, "Human Scale," as "bigness." Bigger became better in nearly every walk of life and farming particularly suffered, as huge yields were demanded from overworked soils.

These increasingly infertile soils are treated with synthetic fertilizers, often byproducts of the chemical and petroleum industries. The fields are then treated with insecticides and herbicides and given large amounts of water to attempt to restore the moisture that the chemicals remove from the soil. The resulting food is then processed heavily, loosing much of its nutritional value in the process, and transported great distances. The resulting waste products from the consumers of these foods and from the farm animals, is not used on the land. Rather, it is flushed away with water, burned into the air, or put into rivers and oceans.

Productivity declines on these acres and Sale describes this new cycle as, "A broken, ... energy intensive, highly exhaustive, and somewhat poisoned loop."

This new pattern of agriculture - now referred to as agribusiness - is not well suited to the rural family farm. Rather, large corporate owned industrialized farms have taken advantage of the new style of chemically dependent American agriculture.

Hooded sprayers operated by field technician Victor Valladares direct herbicide just to areas between rows of grain sorghum (Photo by Jack Dykinga courtesy USDA)

Such large farms, some measuring many thousands of acres, and increased by over 500 percent in the last 50 years while more than three million one family farms have gone out of business.

The environmental and social consequences of this fundamental shift are grave.

During a three week period of time in Missouri, "two corporate hog factories created more environmental degradations in the form of fish kills and dead streams than was created by all of agriculture in the previous decade," said Roger Allison, executive director of the Missouri Rural Crisis Center in his 1998 testimony to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

From 1940 to 1975, U.S. farm output increased by 90 percent while fertilizer use increased by 900 percent. 

Corporate farms make extensive use of fossil fuel burning machines and excessively use high priced energy, contributing to unstable and steadily rising prices.

 
‥網站地圖‥
‥資料檢索‥

結盟授權網站

訂/退閱電子報

 

草山工作假期


回首頁
   

最佳瀏覽環境:IE5.5以上版本,解析度800*600

 
版權皆歸原作者所有,非營利轉載請來信告知!
請支持環境資訊電子報,詳見 捐款方式捐款徵信 
 
社團法人台灣環境資訊協會
Taiwan Environmental Information Association
環境信託基金會(籌) Environmental Trust Foundation
Tel:+886-2-23021122 Fax:+886-2-23020101
108台北市萬華區艋舺大道120巷16弄7號