環境新聞回顧
台灣國際

崔媽媽電子報

【設為首頁】

 

[生活的未來-環境與經濟]每週評論:拯救我們的世界 

晦暗的末日預言:反環保人士用來分散群眾注意力的方式 (下)

 

Healing Our World: Weekly Comment

Doom and Gloom Forecasts: Anti-Environmental Distractions

作者 傑奇艾倫•朱利安諾 博士
2000年10月27日 (ENS)

輛廢氣排放

  長期以來,汽車生產業與保守派政治人物宣稱,聯邦及各州汽車廢氣排放標準訂得太高,造成車價高昂與車輛性能不佳。

  公眾意見受到了這些宣稱的影響,使得許多民眾認為排廢煙霧檢測與強制檢修造成不便,也是對個人自由的否定。車輛排放標準的制定已受汽車生產業嚴重干預,而許多例外罰責的存在,使得汽車造成的污染,仍是對我們空氣品質最大的威脅。

  舉例來說,運動休旅車被歸類為輕型卡車。這類設計原本主要是作為在農場上或建築工地內拖曳物品的卡車,但1975年設定標準時,路上行駛的車輛只有20%被歸類為輕型卡車。到今天,運動休旅車與廂型車都被歸類在輕型卡車中,占了汽車銷售總量一半以上。這類汽車很少被用來拖曳物品,卻用來購物或接送兒童,行駛距離比原本估算輕型卡車的里程還多了幾萬英哩。

  運動休旅車每加侖汽油行駛的里程只有少少的13英哩,而且還排放大量的污染。福特旅行(Excursion)車系每加侖可行駛13英哩,在使用期間、行駛12萬4千英哩後的二氧化碳排放量足足有134噸。相較來看,本田的洞察(Insight)車系每加侖行駛65英哩,使用期間只排放32噸二氧化碳。二氧化碳被認為是全球增溫的主要溫室效應氣體。

  許多現有的技術可將福特探險家(Explorer)從每加侖19.3英哩的消耗提昇至每加侖34.1英哩,一氧化碳污染可以減少43%,其他形式的空氣污染也可以減少76%。這些改進只需要在標價上增加美金935元就可以做到。

  難以置信的是,1975年以前生產的車通常是最嚴重的污染源,卻完全不受政府排煙管制。

  我們不能再將環保和從土壤、空氣、及水中清除毒物這兩件事,仍只當作經濟成長的一項考量而已。

  全人類和全生態系的健康不只是選項之一,他們應是超越其它事項,最首要也是最基本的考量。

  獲利不能只用一個人的銀行帳目上的成長來看,乾淨的土壤、空氣、及水都必須開始出現在企業的試算表上。如果價格反映了由各項產品在研發、製造、運銷、使用、及廢棄處理產品所造成的環境破壞,我們可能會仔細思考後才訂出價格。

  環保和減少毒物必須是首要目標。試想如果地球的生命依存系統若是被破壞了,強健的經濟基礎又有何用?

  我們必須要求用工廠設備更新、重新訓練員工、提供貧病民眾食物與醫療,這些建立健康生態系的方式,作為我們在地球上生存的首要任務。我們的良知才是一切的基礎。

其它資源

一、 需要完整的山巒協會(Sierra Club)報告「用青翠來評估森林(Seeing the Forests for their Green)」,請至http://www.sierraclub.org/forests/report00/index.asp#intro

二、 需要各項產品對環境影響衝擊的實例,可參考共同觀察組織(Corporate Watch)對電腦產業的環境衝擊分析http://www.corpwatch.org/trac/feature/hitech/
computer.html

三、 需要閱讀有關運動休旅車問題的報告,可至http://www.sierraclub.org/globalwarming/
suvreport/

四、 也可來反運動休旅車同好會網頁看看http://www.howard.net/ban-suvs.htm

五、 要是全球軍事支出經費能用來改善環境問題,將會如何? 看看網頁上提出的各項可能性http://www.worldgame.org/wwwproject/

六、 看看目前此時此分全球資源使用狀況http://www.worldgame.org/worldometers/
worldfuel.html

七、 目前最新環境遭破壞狀況的估算在http://www.worldgame.org/worldometers/
worldfuel.html

八、 要了解北美斑梟的簡介,請看http://endangered.fws.gov/i/b6k.html

九、 看看一個州在對環境污染成本了解後,所做的反應例子http://www.me3.org/projects/costs/

十、 找出你們該州國會代表是誰並寫電子郵件給他們,告訴他們應該立即通過建築材料回收利用法案,你可以用該區郵遞區號尋找http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
ziptoit.html
,用州別分類http://www.webslingerz.com/jhoffman/
congress-email.html
,或在http//congress.nw.dc.us/innovate/
index.html
找到各州代表。

傑奇艾倫•朱利安諾博士,是作家及老師,他住在西雅圖。請將你的想法、評論和願景告訴他,可以寄信到jackie@healingourworld.com 或參觀他的網站 http://www.healingourworld.com/

原文網址: http://ens.lycos.com/ens/oct2000/2000L-10-27g.html

版權歸屬Environment News Service(ENS),環境信託基金會 (林以楠 譯,徐怡德 蔡麗伶 審校)

中英對照全文:http://news.ngo.org.tw/issue/ecoeco/2001/issue-ecoeco01051001.htm

 

By Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D.
October 27, 2000 (ENS)

Auto Emissions

For years, auto makers and conservative politicians have claimed that state and federal auto emissions standards are too high, resulting in higher prices for cars and poor vehicle performance.

Public opinion has been influenced by these claims. Most people see smog checks and mandated repairs as an inconvenience and a denial of individual freedoms. But emissions standards for cars and trucks have been heavily influenced by the auto makers, and so many exceptions exist that auto air pollution is still the biggest threat facing our atmosphere. 

For example, sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are classified as light trucks. This designation was originally intended for trucks that were primarily used for hauling around the farm or construction site. In 1975, when those standards were set, only about 20 percent of the vehicles on the road were light trucks. Today, SUVs and minivans are included in the light truck designation and account for over half of all vehicles sold. Few are used to haul anything other than groceries and children, being driven tens of thousands of miles more than light trucks were projected to travel each year.

SUVs get as little as 13 miles to a gallon of gas and emit huge amounts of pollution. A Ford Excursion gets 13 miles per gallon (mpg) and will put out 134 tons of carbon dioxide over a 124,000 mile lifetime. By contrast, a Honda Insight gets 65 mpg and emits 32 tons of carbon dioxide over its useable life. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas considered a major factor in global warming.

Many technologies exist that could turn a Ford Explorer from a 19.3 mpg guzzler into a 34.1 mpg vehicle. Carbon monoxide pollution could be reduced by 43 percent, and other forms of air pollution could be reduced by 76 percent, all for only a $935 increase in the price tag.

Incredibly, cars made before 1975, often the most serious polluters, are totally exempted from government smog rules.

We must put behind us the false belief that environmental protection and the elimination of toxic substances from our earth, air and water are just another set of tradeoffs to be weighed against economic growth.

Human and ecosystem health are not options - they are the first and most fundamental considerations to make which must outweigh all others.

Profitability cannot be measured only by how much one's bank account grows. Healthy earth, air, and water must start appearing on the spreadsheets of industry. If prices reflected the ecosystem devastation caused by development, manufacturing, distribution, use and disposal of most products, we might think twice about making them at all.

Environmental protection and the reduction of toxic substances must be the priority. What good is a strong economic bottom line if our planet's life support systems are trashed?

We must demand that creating healthy ecosystems become our planet's primary business by retooling industries, retraining workers and providing food and health care to the sick and the poor. Our conscience should be the only bottom line. 

RESOURCES

1. For the complete Sierra Club report, "Seeing the Forests for their Green," visit http://www.sierraclub.org/
forests/report00/index.asp#intro

2. For an excellent example of the environmental impact of products, see Corporate Watch's analysis of the environmental impact of computer manufacture at http://www.corpwatch.org/
trac/feature/hitech/computer.html

3. Read a report on the issues with SUVs at http://www.sierraclub.org/
globalwarming/suvreport/

4. Check out the Anti-SUV Fan Club at http://www.howard.net/ban-suvs.htm

5. What if the money used for the military world wide were applied to solving the Earth's problems? See how it could be done at http://www.worldgame.org/
wwwproject/

6. See an up-to-the-minute estimate of world resource use at http://www.worldgame.org/
worldometers/worldfuel.html

7. An up-to-the-minute tally of environmental destruction is at http://www.worldgame.org/
worldometers/worldenv.html

8. For a profile on the Northern Spotted Owl, visit http://endangered.fws.gov/i/b6k.html

9. Look at what one state has done to acknowledge the costs of environmental pollution at http://www.me3.org/
projects/costs/

10. Find out who your Congressional representatives are and e-mail them. Tell them that the time is now to start mandating building materials recycling. If you know your Zip code, you can find them at http://www.visi.com/
juan/congress/ziptoit.html
or you can search by state at http://www.webslingerz.com/
jhoffman/congress-email.html
. You can also find your representatives at http://congress.nw.dc.us/innovate/
index.html
.

[Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D. is a writer and teacher in Seattle. Please send your thoughts, comments, and visions to him at jackie@healingourworld.com and visit his web site at http://www.healingourworld.com/]

http://ens.lycos.com/ens/oct2000/2000L-10-27g.html

 

 
‥網站地圖‥
‥資料檢索‥

結盟授權網站

訂/退閱電子報

 

草山工作假期


回首頁
   

最佳瀏覽環境:IE5.5以上版本,解析度800*600

 
版權皆歸原作者所有,非營利轉載請來信告知!
請支持環境資訊電子報,詳見 捐款方式捐款徵信 
 
社團法人台灣環境資訊協會
Taiwan Environmental Information Association
環境信託基金會(籌) Environmental Trust Foundation
Tel:+886-2-23021122 Fax:+886-2-23020101
108台北市萬華區艋舺大道120巷16弄7號