環境新聞回顧
台灣國際

崔媽媽電子報

【設為首頁】

 

[生活環保]

扼殺未來-校園噴灑殺蟲劑

 

Killing the Future - Pesticide Spraying in Schools

作者:傑奇•艾倫•朱利安諾博士

他們已失去,已經失去;
他們的孩子也將不再希求;
我擔心,
雖然太陽繼續升起,
這樣的日子裡,
沒有人歌唱。
-- 艾倫•克拉米爾

  正如當初所預料,有許多緊要的環境保護工作,在過度保守、受工業界支持的布希政府下,一個接著一個的失敗了。最近這幾個禮拜,加強監控飲用水中砷污染的計劃被移除了,工人的健康及安全讓步了,要求礦主為所製造的毒性污染負起責任的計劃,就這樣被擱置。

  現在很少有人會去冀望那個危害各級學校多時、使我們小孩生病同時危及未來的問題,能得到聯邦政府的任何幫助。

  對毒性化學物質及致命污染的製造者來說,這個趨勢是很棒的。全國獨立商業聯盟、公共政策的主事者Dan Danner,引用上星期「西雅圖時報」中所說的:「對我們來說,這是一口新鮮的空氣,一道溫暖的陽光。」

  可悲的是,學校裡外,在數百萬磅致命的、會摧毀神經系統的殺蟲劑無情的噴灑之下,只有極少數的孩童,能呼吸到新鮮的空氣。

  從幼稚園到大學,不管是哪一年級,你是否曾聽到他們抱怨頭痛、昏眩、肌肉抽蓄、學習困難、不專心、過敏、反胃、嘔吐、喉嚨痛、起紅疹、眼睛痛、起水泡、呼吸有問題、氣喘、輕微的發燒、或覺得沮喪呢?(譯註:美學制從Kindergarden到12年級之意。)

  在你臆測他或她是患了流行性感冒,或是因注意力不足障礙而去看醫生前,先查看一下學校殺蟲劑的施用。因在美國,甚或世界各地,大多數的中小學、大專院校及學習中心,都會在教室、更衣室、盥洗室,噴灑殺蟲劑。或許你該考慮,殺蟲劑或許是造成症狀的原因之一,而且,這是非常有可能會發生的。

  校方及立法者,拒絕為這項危機做任何的事。對健康長期的衝擊,包括癌症或影響生殖能力,不可避免地會顯現在孩提時代。孩子現在的喉痛,往後,可能被證實為癌症或是生殖功能障礙。

  有些在學校施用的化學藥品,甚至因毒性過高而被禁用在食用農作物上。

  聯邦政府很了解這個情況,但是你想,現在當局會建議學校停止購買這些會傷害小孩的有毒產品嗎?

  在1999年11月,「普通會計辦公室」一篇名為「殺蟲劑在學校的使用、影響及替代方法」的報告中,正確地指出:「暴露在殺蟲劑下,孩童會比大部分成人來得更危險,因為相對於單位體重來說,小孩呼吸量較高、食量較高、較成人高的代謝速率。而他們也較常在經常施用殺蟲劑的地點,如地板及草地上玩耍,小孩手和口接觸的頻率也較高。」

  報告中承認,聯邦殺蟲劑、殺菌劑、滅鼠藥法案中,殺蟲劑在美國的使用管理中,對於學校,法令卻隻字未提。報告中亦承認,被美國環保署認可的殺蟲劑,並不代表它會是安全的化學品。

  說得更恰當一點,認可,代表那殺蟲劑「通常不會沒來由的造成人體健康及環境有害的影響」,至於要如何去定義這個「通常」,就值得深思了。

  縱使這些殺蟲劑都依法標示有使用說明,而且超過3千種的殺蟲劑,更有著在學校如何使用的指示,但是這些,都沒有標示建議小朋友要有更好的防護措施,而這個疏失正在危害到孩童、青年甚至大學中的成年人的生命。

  目前美國政府當局偏愛將決策權留給各州政府,到目前為止,美國50州中超過11萬公立小學及數千私立學校、扥兒中心、大專院校中,只有路易斯安那州要求學校單位呈報殺蟲劑的使用量。

  在2000年11月,麻州成為美國第一個禁止在學生在校時、噴灑殺蟲劑的州,除非像白蟻橫行的這種例外。

  除了從受害小孩的家長得知外,這些資料通常闕如。環保署的報告指出,美國毒物管制中心1993至1996的報告中,有2300件殺蟲劑的案例和學校有關,但其中有40%結果未知。一般相信,還有更多的案件沒有呈報,因為家長根本不知道孩子的症狀是跟殺蟲劑毒性有關,而且很少人會和毒物管制中心聯絡。

  殺蟲劑業者正是仰賴資料的缺乏,只要沒有長程的研究,業者可以繼續說,既然資料不足,他們該還是可以被准許販賣他們的產品。

  在1991年,紐約州檢察官總辦公室的環境保護處,調查紐約331所學校,彙整公立學校使用殺蟲劑的資訊。他們發現,紐約市中的每一個學校及在Nassau/Suffolk區88%的學校,均使用殺蟲劑。在紐約東郊及上紐約的學校,是最少使用殺蟲劑的,僅有74%的比例。

  殺蟲劑被施用在教室、辦公室、遊樂場、草地、遊戲區、更衣室、盥洗室、儲藏室、地下室及學校的體育館和托兒所中。廚房及自助餐廳是最常被噴灑的地方,它被用來消除許多不同的害蟲,包括雜草、小老鼠、蟑螂、螞蟻、蒼蠅、蝨子、扁虱、跳蚤及其他昆蟲。有些噴灑在外面以殺死蜜蜂、胡蜂、螞蟻、嚙齒類及鴿子。

  殺蟲劑及溶劑的氣體,會殘存在室內的空氣中數星期、甚至數年之久。殺蟲劑的殘餘物,會污染室內的表面及存留在地毯或粉塵中達數月或數年,它們也可以在室外的土壤中存留數年。有些學校中常用的殺草劑,可以在土壤中殘存1至5年。

  大專院校及成人學校並不會免疫。據一個本身為多發性敏感失調所苦的家長指出,北卡大學胡亂地在學生的宿舍、自助餐廳及廚房使用殺蟲劑,讓她女兒承受了極大的風險。她理直且理性的努力讓學校注意此問題,但是卻遭到訕笑,校方興趣缺缺。其實不只學校的工作人員會噴灑致命的殺蟲劑,連清潔人員甚至學生自己都常使用。

  有很多報告是來自於受害孩子的家長。奧瑞岡Wilsonville小學的學校顧問瑪西亞•克拉克,在2000年四月告訴「殺蟲劑代替物西北聯盟」,她和學校同事才受害不久。校方為了控制白蟻,在當年二月的某個週末,在校區的一側噴灑了整天的殺蟲劑。瑪西亞說:「有個老師在進入學校後馬上氣喘發作,同時舌上及牙齦上的長水泡。其他的同仁有反胃、眼睛過敏及頭痛的症狀。當我在一間噴灑過殺蟲劑的教室工作半個鐘頭後,我就嚴重的頭痛及聲音嘶啞。兩天後,我不得不請一天假休養。在這星期中,一年級小朋友有超過半數的人,因有鏈球菌引起的喉部症狀而回家。」

  別等著你的州政府或是聯邦政府行動,你必須將這個任務交付在自己手上。

  • 立刻聯絡孩子的學校,了解殺蟲劑的施用方式,同時要求立刻停止。通知其他家長開始仔細紀錄孩子的症狀,無論多麼微小。無論何時,若有殺蟲劑中毒的跡象,打電話給學校,要求知道殺蟲劑是何時施用的。別讓他們在這個議題上把你打敗,讓自己像那些蟲子一樣,揮之不去。
  • 要求你的孩子,在學校看到任何像在使用殺蟲劑的情形時,必須向你報告。告訴他們,聞到怪味、眼睛有灼燒感、或呼吸困難時,要馬上報告老師,而且要求知會家長。
  • 請一天假,和其他家長去孩子的學校,看看有沒有用殺蟲劑。

  給孩子們吃健康、有機的食品;瓶裝、沒有添加氟的水,而且盡可能少吃甜食,以維持孩子良好的免疫能力。向你的家庭醫生詢問echinacea(譯註:某種菊科植物)或其他可增強免疫系統的草藥。

  政客們正剝奪你孩子享受空氣、水及地球的天賦權力,別讓他們也將孩子的未來也毀了。

參考資源

1. 這個議題可經由Pesticide Watch追蹤: http://www.pesticidewatch.org/Html/
Schools/Schools.htm
. 那裡有一套教你讓孩子學校不用殺蟲劑的方法,以及一份常用化學藥品的清單和它們的影響。

2..找出代表你的國會議員,寄電子郵件給他們,要求他們在全美國的學校禁止使用殺蟲劑。如果你知道你的郵遞區號,可經由以下網站找到他們:http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
ziptoit.html

3. 可在Rachel Carson Council(一非營利組織)的「殺蟲劑基本指南」中,學習有關殺蟲劑的基本資料,和它們的影響。書摘及購買資料可在以下網站找到: http://members.aol.com/rccouncil/
ourpage/samples.htm
.

4. 讀有關全國學校殺蟲劑使用的案例: http://www.wsn.org/pesticides/
usexp.shtml
.

5. 讀有關食物中的殺蟲劑: http://ipmworld.umn.edu/chapters/pimentel.htm

6. 看紐約州學校使用殺蟲劑的報告: http://www.oag.state.ny.us/environment/
schools96.html
.

7. 讀一份有關2000年麻州兒童保護法案的文件: http://www.massdfa.org:8/cpa/
cpa_facts.htm

8. 讀有關幼年癌症與殺蟲劑的關聯: http://www.monitor.net/rachel/r588.html

9. 讀有關學校或公園過度使用殺蟲劑的研究: http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2000/jun/jun13a_00.html.

10. 看一份威斯康辛州學校使用殺蟲劑的報告: http://www.wsn.org/pesticides/
schools.shtml
. 力勸你的學校做類似的研究

11.如果你對孩子念的大專院校殺蟲劑的使用,有直接認識的話,請聯絡 Rachel Carson Council: RCCouncil@aol.com. 他們正為一份報告在整理數據。

12. 此議題這裡有很好的概論: http://www.office.com/global/0,2724,184
-17690,FF.html
.

13. MSNBC 所做針對殺蟲劑在學校使用的特別報告: http://www.msnbc.com/
news/423807.asp?cp1=1#BODY

14. 看看如何保護孩子的腦部發育,防止毒性物質威脅: http://www.igc.org/psr/
protect-child.htm
. 對此議題這裡有完整的報告: http://www.igc.org/psr/ihwdwnld.htm.

15. 看看家長們對殺蟲劑在北卡大學中問題的說明: http://home.interpath.com/
sioux/tox/INTRODUC.htm

傑奇艾倫•朱利安諾 博士是在西雅圖的一個老師及作家。你會發現他正在思考著,到底有多少從海裡迴游的鮪魚,來到這兒遭受汞污染的地方溪流產卵。你可以將你的想法、評論、及觀點告訴他jackie@healingourworld.com 或參觀他的網頁http://www.healingourworld.com/

原文與圖片詳見:http://ens-news.com/ens/mar2001/2001L-03-23g.html

版權歸屬Environment News Service(ENS),環境信託基金會(楊璧如 譯,蘇崧棱 、蔡麗伶 審校)

中英對照全文:http://news.ngo.org.tw/issue/surround/2001/issue-surround01062101.htm

 

By Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D.

They've lost it, lost it,
and their children
will never even wish for it -
and I am afraid . . .
because the sun keeps rising
and these days
nobody sings.
-- Aaron Kramer 

As predicted, many critical environmental protections are falling, one by one, to the ultraconservative, industry backed administration of President George W. Bush. In the last couple of weeks, the plan to improve pollution controls for arsenic in our drinking water have been eliminated, worker health and safety has been compromised, and plans were put into place to suspend the rule that would hold mine owners responsible for the terrible toxic pollution they create. 
Few now have any hope that a problem that has been plaguing elementary schools and colleges for decades, making our children sick and compromising the future, will get help at the federal level. 

The climate for producers of toxic chemicals and deadly pollution, however, is great. Dan Danner, head of public policy for the National Federation of Independent Business, was quoted in the "Seattle Times" last week as saying "to us, this is a breath of fresh air, a ray of warm sunshine." 

Sadly, few of our children can breath that fresh air in their schools, which are being relentlessly sprayed, inside and out, with millions of pounds of deadly, nervous system destroying pesticides.

Ever have a child, either in the K-12 grades or away at college, complain of headaches, dizziness, muscle cramps, learning disabilities, trouble concentrating, irritability, nausea, vomiting, sore throats, rashes, eye pain, blisters, breathing problems, asthma attacks, low grade fevers, or depression? 

Before you assume that he or she has the flu or go to see your doctor about attention deficit disorder, check the school's pesticide policy. The probability is high that you should consider pesticide exposure as one of the possible causes, since most schools, colleges, universities, and learning centers in the United States, and probably the world, is spraying pesticides in classrooms, locker rooms, bathrooms, kitchens and cafeterias. 

School officials and legislators are resisting doing anything about this crisis. The long term health impacts such as cancer and reproductive harm will inevitably show up as our children age. The sore throat your child exhibits today could manifest as cancer or reproductive dysfunction in later life.

Some of the chemicals used in schools are even prohibited for use on food crops because of their toxicity. 

The federal government is well aware of this situation, but do you think that the present administration is going to suggest that a school district stop buying products from a business, even toxic products that are harming children? 

In a report by the General Accounting Office issued in November 1999 titled "Use, Effects, and Alternatives to Pesticides in Schools," it is correctly stated that "children are at greater risk from pesticide exposure than most adults because, pound for pound of body weight, children breathe more, eat more, and have more rapid metabolisms than adults, and they also play on the floor and lawn where pesticides are commonly applied. Children have more frequent hand-to-mouth contact as well." 

The report admits that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, the legislation that controls the use of pesticides in the United States, says nothing about their use in schools. The report also admits that when a pesticide is approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), this does not mean that the chemical is safe. 

Rather, approval means that the pesticide will not "generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment." How "generally" has been defined causes much concern. 

Although pesticides are technically labeled with instructions for their use, and over 3,000 pesticides have instructions for school application, no label suggests that children should be afforded any greater protection than any other group. This omission is risking the lives of children, young adults and even adults in college as well. 

The present U.S. administration is fond of leaving decision making power up to the states. Yet of the 50 U.S. states with over 110,000 public elementary schools and many thousand more private schools, daycare centers, colleges and universities, only Louisiana requires its school districts to report the amount of pesticides used. 

As of November, 2000 Massachusetts became the first state to ban the use of pesticides on school property while children are present, with some exceptions such as active termite infestations. 

Data is virtually unavailable, except from parents who know that their children have been harmed. The EPA report states that the American Association of Poison Control Centers data from 1993 through 1996 contains about 2,300 pesticide related exposures involving individuals at schools. But outcomes are not known for over 40 percent of the reported cases and it is believed that many thousands more may go unreported because parents do not know that their children's symptoms are related to a pesticide poisoning and few would contact a poison control center. 

The pesticide industry relies upon this absence of data. Without long term studies, the industry can go on saying that since little data exists, they should be permitted to continue selling their products.

In 1991, the Environmental Protection Bureau of the New York State Attorney General's Office surveyed 331 schools in New York to gather information on the use of pesticides in the state's public schools. They discovered that pesticides were applied at every New York City school, and at 88 percent of Nassau/Suffolk schools. Schools in the northern New York City suburbs and upstate New York reported the lowest rate of use, 74 percent. 

Pesticides are being used in classrooms, offices, playgrounds, lawns, playing fields, locker rooms, bathrooms, storage rooms, basements and in school gymnasiums and day care rooms. Kitchens and cafeterias are the areas most frequently treated with pesticides. Pesticides are applied to eliminate many kinds of pests, including weeds, mice, cockroaches, ants, flies, lice, ticks, fleas and other insects. Some spray outside to kill bees, wasps, ants, rodents and pigeons. 

Pesticide and solvent vapors can persist in indoor air for weeks or even years. Pesticide residues can contaminate indoor surfaces, and can remain in carpets and dust for months or years. They can also persist outdoors in soil for years and some weed-killers commonly used at schools can last from 1 to 5 years in the soil.

Colleges and adult schools are not immune. According to a concerned parent, herself a sufferer of multiple chemical sensitivity disorder (MCS), North Carolina State University indiscriminately uses pesticides in students dormitories, including the cafeteria and its kitchen, putting her daughter at great risk. Her well reasoned and rational efforts to interest the school administration in the problem have been met with ridicule and a profound lack of interest. Not only do the facilities crews apply deadly pesticides, but the housekeeping staff and even the students themselves will often use them. 

Reports abound from parents with children that have been harmed. Marcia Clark, a school counselor at Wilsonville Primary School in Oregon, told the Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides that she was a victim in April 2000 that she was a recent victim, as were others at the school where she works. In February of that year, one wing of the school was sprayed over a weekend with pesticides to control ants. Marcia said that "one teacher had an immediate asthma attack upon entering the school, and also developed blisters on her tongue and gums. Other staff developed nausea, eye irritation, and headaches. After I worked in one of the affected classrooms for a half-hour, I had a pounding headache and my voice was hoarse. Two days later, I had to miss a day of work to recuperate. By mid-week, over half the students in one first grade class went home with 'strep throat' symptoms," Clark said. 

Don't wait for your state or the federal government to act. You must take this issue into your own hands:

  • Contact your children's school immediately and find out their pesticide application policy. Demand that they stop at once. Contact other parents and begin keeping detailed logs on your children's illnesses, no matter how minor. Whenever they report a symptom that could suggest pesticide poisoning, call the school and demand to know when pesticides were applied. Don't let them beat you down on this issue. Make yourself a pest that won't go away.
  • Ask your children to tell you if they see anything that looks like someone applying a pesticide at school. Tell them to report any strange odors, burning sensations in their eyes, or trouble breathing to their teacher at once and to demand that you be called.
  • Take a day off work with a few other parents and watch your child's school. Look for pesticide application.

Keep your children's immune systems strong by feeding them healthy, organic foods, bottled, non-fluoridated water, and as few sweets as possible. Consult your health care practitioner about giving your children echinacea or some other immune system building herb.

Politicians are working hard to rob your children of their birthright to the air, the water, and the Earth. Don't let them rob the future of the children themselves.

RESOURCES

1. Track this issue through Pesticide Watch at: http://www.pesticidewatch.org/Html/
Schools/Schools.htm
. There you will find an organizing kit to help you rid your child's school of pesticides and a list of the commonly used chemicals and their effects. 

2. Find out who your Congressional representatives are and e-mail them. Demand that they stop the use of pesticides at schools throughout the U.S. If you know your Zip code, you can find them at: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
ziptoit.html
 

3. Learn about the basics of pesticides and their effect from the Rachel Carson Council's comprehensive "Basic Guide to Pesticides." Excerpts and ordering information can be found at: http://members.aol.com/rccouncil/
ourpage/samples.htm
.

4. Read about incidents of pesticide exposure in schools throughout the nation at: http://www.wsn.org/
pesticides/usexp.shtml

5. Read about pesticides in foods at: http://ipmworld.umn.edu/
chapters/pimentel.htm
.

6. See the New York State report on pesticide use in schools at: http://www.oag.state.ny.us/environment/
schools96.html
.

7. Read a fact sheet on the Massachusetts Childrens' Protection Act of 2000 at: http://www.massdfa.org:80/cpa/cpa_facts.htm

8. Read about the connection between childhood cancer and pesticides at: http://www.monitor.net/rachel/r588.html

9. Read a study that found that schools and parks overuse pesticides at: http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2000/jun/jun13a_00.html

10. See a report on the use of pesticides in Wisconsin schools at: http://www.wsn.org/pesticides/
schools.shtml
. Urge your school district to conduct a similar study. 

11. If you have any direct knowledge of the application of pesticides in your child's college or university, contact the Rachel Carson Council at: RCCouncil@aol.com. They are compiling data for a report. 

12. See a good overview on the subject at: http://www.office.com/
global/0,2724,184-17690,FF.html

13. MSNBC did a special report on pesticide use in schools at: http://www.msnbc.com/news/423807.asp
?cp1=1#BODY. 

14. See how to protect your child from the many toxic threats to brain development at: http://www.igc.org/psr/protect-child.htm. See a complete report on the subject at: http://www.igc.org/
psr/ihwdwnld.htm
.

15. See a parent's account of the pesticide problem at North Carolina State University at: http://home.interpath.com/sioux/tox/
INTRODUC.htm

[Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D. is a writer and teacher in Seattle. He can be found wondering how many of the salmon returning from the sea to spawn in local streams are contaminated with mercury. Please send your thoughts, comments, and visions to him at jackie@healingourworld.com and visit his website at http://www.healingourworld.com/

http://ens-news.com/ens/mar2001/
2001L-03-23g.html

 

 
‥網站地圖‥
‥資料檢索‥

結盟授權網站

訂/退閱電子報

 

草山工作假期


回首頁
   

最佳瀏覽環境:IE5.5以上版本,解析度800*600

 
版權皆歸原作者所有,非營利轉載請來信告知!
請支持環境資訊電子報,詳見 捐款方式捐款徵信 
 
社團法人台灣環境資訊協會
Taiwan Environmental Information Association
環境信託基金會(籌) Environmental Trust Foundation
Tel:+886-2-23021122 Fax:+886-2-23020101
108台北市萬華區艋舺大道120巷16弄7號