上週我們迎接了今年夏天最燠熱的天氣,因此我們打開電扇,調節窗戶,來捕捉家家戶戶皆不可或缺的新鮮舒適空氣。2007年整個夏天我們只有10天打開了冷氣壓縮機,而整年的空調費僅僅20美元,怎樣,很酷吧?
我們主要在窗戶上動手腳。當知道將有個大熱天時,我們在早上9點就把窗戶關上,將夜間餘留下來的冷空氣留在屋裡,在必要時候打開電扇,當戶外溫度從從攝氏18度上升到31度時,屋內溫度僅不過從19度上升到26度。
一個住宅用的中央空調每季大約會消耗3560瓩的電力,假設每一度電7美分,香柏瀑布市(Cedar Falls)有13000戶人家,如果每個人都要使用空調,那一年要花上320萬美元讓每個人都有冷氣可吹。
相反地,如果所有人都照我們的方法來作,總共會消耗284度電,全鎮的冷氣費只有25844每美元,每年幾乎可省300萬美元。
如果使用這個粗略估計推算,黑鷹縣一年將可以省下1150萬元的電費,Des Moines都會區可以省下4200萬元,整個愛荷華州可省2億6700萬元。
燒1噸煤可以發2343度電,以容量3000磅的空調來計算,每家每季平均要燒1.5噸的煤為冷氣供電。而在發電過程中還會產生12毫克的汞,假設有12週需要開空調,那平均1星期就會排放1毫克。
這個汞排放你可能看不到,但它總會在某處的發電廠排出,別忘了,這只是一個家庭的排放而已。
食物藥物檢驗局(FDA)規定,對於一個20公斤重的嬰兒來說,汞的攝取量每週不得超過0.056毫克。
我們的節能家庭還使用了另一項新科技,環境行動者暨作家Bill McKibben稱它為「線型太陽能蒸發系統」-就是曬衣繩!
我們真的需要烘衣機嗎?它們每年要吃掉1440度的電呢。
香柏瀑布市一年要花上130萬元來烘衣;黑鷹縣,5百萬;Des Moines都會區,1900萬;愛荷華州,1億1700萬。我們一邊烘衣一邊還溫暖了地球。
我們在戶外設置了許多曬衣繩,在冬天我們把繩子和曬衣架掛在室內地下室。
將上述兩項加總,香柏瀑布市的居民一年要花上450萬元吹冷氣跟烘衣服。對於香柏瀑布市而言,你有沒有想過這450萬對社區的經濟有多重要?
考察了我們社區裡電與瓦斯的使用情況後,我發現有人的耗電是我們家的8倍,瓦斯用了4倍,由此可知節能的空間非常之巨大,投入節能,可讓我們的經濟更為自主也更有彈性。
這問題無關科技,而關係到我們的文化。我們需要決心和鼓勵大量節能的公共政策。
無論在家中、公司、學校、教堂、政府機關與交通運輸系統,積極的節能政策都應該是各級政府的頭號任務,因為我們早已知道如何將我們的能耗減半,而這只是個保守估計而已。
※ 本文作者Kamyar Enshayan是一位機械工程師,專業為農業、氣候學與太陽能。現為北愛荷華大學能源與環境教育中心主任,同時也是香柏瀑布市議會的一員。Email:kamyar.enshayan@uni.edu
The past week has ushered in the summer most sultry weather to date, but in our household, we like basic fresh air, unconditioned. So we use windows and fans when necessary. In 2007, our heat pump ran a total of 10 days the entire summer. Our total cooling cost for 2007: $20. Cool.
Our primary strategy is windows management. When we know it is going to be a hot day, we close our windows by 9 am to keep in the cool air from the night before and use fans if we need to. When outside goes from 65 to 87, the inside of our house goes from 67 to 78. Very pleasant.
A residential central-air system uses roughly 3,560 kilowatt hours per season. Assuming seven cents per kwh and 13,000 households in Cedar Falls, if everyone used their central air, residents of Cedar Falls would spend $3.2 million to keep cool.
In contrast, if everyone cooled with fresh-air technology - in our case, 284 kwh per season for fans - the electric-cooling bill for the whole town would be $258,440. Nearly $3 million per year in savings for Cedar Falls.
And if you extend the same ballpark calculation to Black Hawk County, the savings would be $11.5 million per year; for the Des Moines metro area, $42 million; and for the whole state of Iowa, $267 million.
It takes a ton of coal to produce 2,343 kwh of electricity. An average household burns 1.5 tons of coal per season for cooling. A 3,000-pound air conditioner!
Burning 1.5 tons of coal to cool just one house for one summer emits roughly 12 milligrams of mercury. Assuming 12 weeks of cooling, that amounts to one milligram of mercury per week, either here or near whichever power plant that produced our electricity. And that is just for one household.
The Food and Drug Administration's limit on mercury ingestion for a 45 pound child is 0.056 milligrams per week.
Our household also uses another well-proven cutting-edge technology - the linear evaporative solar-drying system - as environmental activist and author Bill McKibben calls it - otherwise known as the clothesline.
Do we really need clothes dryers? They consume 1,440 kwh per year.
Cedar Falls spends $1.3 million on clothes drying every year; Black Hawk County, $5 million; Des Moines metro area, $19 million; and the whole state of Iowa, $117 million, to dry our clothes while warming the planet.
We have a set of clotheslines outside for fresh air to do the work. In winter, we use clotheslines set up in the basement, plus clothes racks.
Adding things up, Cedar Falls residents spend $4.5 million on cooling and clothes drying every year. What would be the community economic impact of retaining a significant portion of that $4.5 million locally?
After looking at actual electricity and natural gas use of numerous homes in my community, I discovered that some homes use eight times more electricity than my household and four times more natural gas. The potential to trim energy waste is tremendous. Acting on that potential will add self-reliance and resilience to our economic vitality.
This is not a technological issue; it is a cultural one. It is a matter of commitment and public policies that encourage massive reduction in energy use.
And that - aggressive energy conservation in homes, businesses, schools, churches, government buildings and transportation - should be the highest priority for local and state government policies. We already know everything we need to know to cut our energy consumption by half, if not more.
{Kamyar Enshayan is a mechanical engineer with graduate training in agriculture, climatology and solar energy. He is director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Education at the University of Northern Iowa. He also serves as a member of the Cedar Falls City Council. Contact: kamyar.enshayan@uni.edu}
全文及圖片詳見:ENS