賓州淨水組織(The Pennsylvania Campaign for Clean Water)以「緩衝100」為名,向美國賓州環保部提出建議案,要求賓州所有河川溪流周邊的開發案都需要保護水岸旁100英呎的林地。
德拉瓦州的河川管理人瑪雅(Maya van Rossum)對此解釋說:「如果我們要保護我們的家園免於洪水、乾旱與污染,如果我們想要提供人民高品質的飲水、休閒空間與更多商業活動,那麼建立河岸緩衝區來保護水源是關鍵的一步,100英呎寬是緩衝區的基本要求,對於敏感的河川則需要更高標準。」
這件要求賓州環保部做出應對的請願書獲得了全州110個公民團體、商業團體和政府機關的背書,以及25 名跨越黨派州議員,來自上下議院的支持。
這項提案只會影響到新的開發案,原本在緩衝區內的建物不受影響。負責建造並維護緩衝區的費用由開發商負擔,不會花到納稅人的錢。
賓州非營利「淨水行動」主任阿威特(Myron Arnowitt)表示,賓州已經有12500英哩的河水受到污染破壞,建立緩衝區將可以讓這些溪流恢復健康,並且保護那些還沒被污染的河川。
青綠地景工作室的景觀建築師達克威勒(Tavis Dockwiller)說明了緩衝區之於河流的好處,「因為我們不太瞭解保護溪流的好處,所以在溪流流域上面加蓋或是恣意破壞,今天我們必須停止一再犯下相同的錯誤。100英呎的緩衝區並不只是環保人士的奢侈品,而是為了保護我們安全健康的必要步驟。」「這些緩衝將可以保護並淨化我們的水,還可以減少洪水帶來的損失與雨水管理的花費。」
來自聯邦北切斯特直轄市的帕拉維(Andy Paravis)說明他們的城鎮--北卡芬特(North Coventry)已經開始採用100英呎緩衝區的規定,而且得到良好的成效。但他建議州政府需要針對整條溪流進行管制,因為行政區的疆界會將溪水的治理分割成數段,分屬不同市鎮。如果上游市鎮任由溪流污染,我們全部都會受到影響。
共和黨的州議員哈波(Kate Harper)說,「我們最近才發現土地的使用,對水的質量與水域生態所造成的影響。因為這樣的認知,我們必須對我們的共有財產訂出安全緩衝區,以供我們及後代子孫不斷享受乾淨之水所帶來的好處。」
民主黨的州議員喬治(Camille George)也說,「大地之母本來就需要緩衝區,我們也需要緩衝區,這是基本常識,沒什麼好覺得誇張。」
參眾議院的議員聯手對這項提案表達了支持,要求環保部立法規定水岸100英呎為緩衝區。
截至目前為止,環保部長麥金蒂(Kathleen McGinty)沒有對此做出回應。
A proposal that would require all new developments in Pennsylvania to protect rivers and streams on their properties with a forested strip of land at least 100 feet wide was presented today to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, DEP. The Pennsylvania Campaign for Clean Water launched the proposal under the banner "Buffers 100."
Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, explains, "If we are to protect our communities from flooding, drought and pollution, if we are to provide our communities with high quality drinking water, recreation, and growing businesses, it is critical we protect our streams and rivers with forested buffers that are a minimum of 100 feet wide, and greater where we have more sensitive streams."
The proposal requesting the DEP propose new regulations requiring the buffers has been endorsed by 110 citizens groups, businesses and municipal organizations from across the state, along with 25 legislators from both parties and both chambers of the General Assembly.
The proposal would apply to new development only and could not affect existing structures within the buffer zone. Buffers would be built and maintained by developers, at no cost to taxpayers.
State director for the nonprofit Clean Water Action Myron Arnowitt says 12,500 miles of streams in Pennsylvania are already degraded by pollution. "Buffers can help restore many of these streams to health and protect the rest from harmful pollution," he said.
Tavis Dockwiller, a landscape architect from Viridian Landscape Studio, described how streams would benefit from buffers. "Through a lack of understanding about how important protecting our streams is, we have paved over and otherwise abused our watersheds. We must stop making the same mistakes." "One hundred foot minimum stream buffers are not a luxury of environmentalists but instead are necessary to protect our health and safety," he said. "These buffers protect and clean our water, and reduce both flood damage and the cost of stormwater management."
Andy Paravis of the Federation of Northern Chester County Municipalities noted that his township, North Coventry, has already adopted a 100 foot buffer requirement and has seen positive benefits from it. But he said, "The state needs to require buffers on all streams since water doesn respect municipal boundaries and wee all affected by what the municipality upstream does."
State Representative Kate Harper, a Montgomery Republican, said, "We have only recently become aware of how our use of nearby land affects the quality and quantity of water and aquatic life in our rivers and streams. With that knowledge comes a responsibility to define for the entire Commonwealth a safe buffer area for Pennsylvania waterways so that we can continue to enjoy the benefits of clean water for generations to come."
"Mother Nature needs a buffer zone. We need a buffer zone," said Rep. Camille George, a Clearfield Democrat. "There is nothing extreme about this except for extreme common sense."
The legislators were joined by other members of the House and Senate who demonstrated their support for the Buffers 100 proposal by urging the DEP to propose regulations that would require minimum 100 foot buffers.
So far, DEP Secretary Kathleen McGinty has not responded to their request.
全文及圖片詳見:ENS