共和黨主導 美眾院大砍環境預算 限制保育計畫 | 環境資訊中心
國際新聞

共和黨主導 美眾院大砍環境預算 限制保育計畫

2011年07月22日
摘譯自2011年7月14日ENS美國,華府報導;段譽豪編譯;蔡麗伶審校

2011年7月9日,一名男子在馬里蘭州 Bladensburg受污染的Anacostia河中游泳。圖片來自:  Mr. T. in DC相本。
2011年7月9日,一名男子在馬里蘭州 Bladensburg受污染的Anacostia河中游泳。圖片來自:  Mr. T. in DC相本。

美國共和黨主導的眾議院預算委員會批准了一項2012財政年度的削減方案,允許在毗鄰大峽谷的公共土地上開採鈾礦,限制美國環保署設定溫室氣體排放標準的基金,並且免除石油與公用事業公司在潔淨空氣法案下的限制。在11日眾議院撥款委員會中,環保署的預算被削減15億美金,內政部的經費則在法案通過後被削減了7.15億美金。

總體而言,該法案包含了275億美金的經費,比去年低了21億美金,更比歐巴馬總統對內政部、環保署、林務局以及其他獨立相關機構的預算要求低了38億美金。

該委員會的共和黨成員通過這個法案是衝著環保署而來的。

肯塔基州的眾議院撥款委員會主席Hal Rogers說,「這個法案發出的強烈訊息是美國環保署的『法規領導立法』以及凌駕國會權利的作法,受到兩黨議員的強力反對。」

然而,投票記錄與Rogers所聲稱的兩黨共識相矛盾。這份法案在黨強力的動員下走出了委員會,進入全院表決階段。

華盛頓州的撥款委員會副主席Norm Dicks說,這項法案「將摧毀我們的環境以及過去努力維護美國自然遺產的付出。其中兩個關鍵的例子是,這項法案對水土保持基金的支出是40年最低,而環保署的經費十年來也沒這麼低過。」

「這項法案將大大削減環保署履行其職務的能力-這也許是某些與我不同陣營的同事們的真正目的。」Dicks 說,「但這影響將波及全國各地,包括延宕已久不斷累積的水處理基礎設施計畫,以及用水與空氣品質的下降。」

主席 Rogers 在13日直截了當的表明這項法案是針對環保署而來。他說:「這項法案限制了環保署的人員並且採取明確的行動,指出環保署透過修訂潔淨空氣法案,在溫室氣體規範上的錯誤方向、暫停了阿帕拉契的採礦許可以及對水泥以及公用事業的打擊,並且阻撓石油與天然氣在外大陸棚的開發許可。」

維吉尼亞民主黨眾議員 Jim Moran 是內政與環境撥款小組委員會副主席,稱該法案「粗糙、草率編列預算並且是早有預謀的傷害美國人民的健康與環境。」

條例草案:

  • 透過解除對科羅拉多河鈾礦開採禁令,允許在毗鄰大峽谷的聯邦土地上開採鈾礦,可能使1700萬仰賴河流供應飲用水的人,暴露在放射性廢棄物的風險。
  • 取消有毒化學物質流入河川的管制,使得山頂採礦變得更容易進行。
  • 拒絕增加學校的空氣汙染毒物的監測經費,也不增加深水地平線漏油的訴訟經費,保護英國石油而使學校變得不安全。
  • 放任殼牌、艾克森以及英國石油等大型石油公司,在墨西哥灣外新鑽探區排放數千磅的污染物到空氣中,豁免其在潔淨空氣法案中的責任。
  • 拒絕提高檢查外海油井增加設備的人力與經費,使得漏油的風險增加。
  • 刪除內政部野地命令(Wild Lands Secretarial Order)經費,共和黨表示,該命令會對農牧業、能源生產、休閒娛樂以及公有地上的其他活動造成衝擊。一項類似的措施通過了眾議院2011財政年度預算,決議繼續。
  • 刪除環保署依據潔淨空氣法案對農場灰塵等空氣中懸浮微粒監控的經費。
  • 刪除環保署制定對硬岩採礦作業要求額外財務保證的計畫經費。
  • 如果各州政府採行的壓艙水管制標準比聯邦更嚴格,將不可接受環保署的五大湖基金。
  • 指示環保署對其施行規範造成的影響進行累計評估。
  • 禁止「運用最佳實行控制技術」法規以及「跨州空氣污染法規」的經費(又稱為傳輸法規),這兩項法規都在限制發電廠的有毒氣體排放。這兩條法規都是在回應法院命令。

一位美國魚類暨野生動物署的前署長說,這項法案對國家的野生動物傷害尤其大。

非營利的「捍衛野生動物組織」副執行長Jamie Rappaport Clark,曾在1997至2001年柯林頓政府時期,擔任美國魚類暨野生動物署署長。

她現在稱這個法案叫做「殺死野生動物的科學怪人法案」。

該法案將會:

  • 停止為面臨滅絕動物與其棲地增加新的保護。Clark 表示,這對為生存而掙扎的海象而言是個大災難。
  • 使挑戰懷俄明州「對狼格殺勿論」的立法行動受到限制。
  • 限制環保署增加對水域以及相關社區與野生動物的保護。農藥對鮭魚、青蛙與其他野生動物已經是一大威脅。
  • 對本國數量下降且受威脅物種,以及來自其他國外但每年有部分時間生活在美國的遷徙性物種,其研究經費將受限縮。
  • 削減國家野生動物保護區、棲地復育以及其他關鍵保育支出的經費。委員會批准了數十億美金的開支削減,將會傷害原本已有經費的保護區,也將削弱環境保護。

共和黨表示,削減開支是最重要的目標。

內政部撥款小組委員會主席Mike Simpson說,「現在是一個破紀錄赤字與債務的時代,如果我們從上一屆國會中學到什麼,那就是不能用消費來換取經濟復甦。」

副主席Moran 則指出,「環保署在中央與地方絕大多數的預算都已經被削減。而這些基礎設施計畫在全國各地創造了就業機會,並提供納稅人一個最基本的服務期望:乾淨的水。」

House Republicans Chop Clean Water, Air, Wildlife Funding
WASHINGTON, DC, July 14, 2011 (ENS)

The Republican-led House Appropriations Committee has approved a restrictive spending bill for Fiscal Year 2012 that allows uranium mining on public lands adjacent to the Grand Canyon, prohibits funding for the U.S. EPA to set greenhouse gas standards, and exempts oil and utility companies from the Clean Air Act.

The EPA's budget would be cut by $1.5 billion and the Interior Department would take a $715 million hit under the bill passed by the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.

In total, the bill includes $27.5 billion in spending - a reduction of $2.1 billion below last year's level and $3.8 billion below President Barack Obama's budget request for the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Forest Service, and other independent and related agencies.

The Republican members of the committee have used the bill to take aim at the EPA in particular.

House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers, of Kentucky, said, "This bill sends a strong message that the EPA's 'legislation by regulation' and commandeering of congressional authority is opposed by a strong bi-partisan contingent of lawmakers."

However, the voting record contradicts Rogers' claim of bi-partisanship. The bill passed out of committee by a vote strictly along party lines and now goes to the full House for a vote.

The Appropriations Committee's Ranking Member, Norm Dicks of Washington, said the bill "will devastate the environment and our ongoing efforts to preserve America's natural heritage. Two key examples of this potential damage are that the bill includes the lowest level of spending in the Land and Water Conservation Fund in more than 40 years and funding levels for EPA not seen in more than a decade."

"This bill would substantially diminish the capacity of EPA to carry out its responsibilities - which may actually be the goal of some of my colleagues on the other side," Dicks said. "But the repercussions will be felt across the nation, including an ever-growing backlog of water treatment infrastructure projects and a decline in air and water quality."

Chairman Rogers is straightforward about the bill's intent to handcuff the EPA. "The legislation caps EPA personnel and takes explicit action to address EPA's wrong-headed greenhouse gas regulations, its de facto moratorium on mining permits in Appalachia, its attack on the cement and utility industries through unsolicited revisions to the Clean Air Act, and its obstruction of oil and gas permitting in the Outer Continental Shelf," he said Wednesday.

Democratic Congressman Jim Moran of Virginia, ranking member of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior and Environment, called the bill a "poorly crafted, negligently funded, pre-meditated attack on the health of our people and the environment."

The bill:

  • allows uranium mining on federal lands adjacent to the Grand Canyon by lifting the moratorium on uranium mining along the Colorado River, potentially exposing 17 million people, dependent on the river for drinking water, to radioactive waste.
  • paves the way for more mountain-top mining by blocking protections against toxic chemicals from mining waste running into our streams.
  • protects BP and makes schools less safe by rejecting additional funding for the air toxic monitoring at schools or for the Deepwater Horizon litigation.
  • allows thousands of pounds of pollutants into the air by exempting big oil companies like Shell, Exxon and BP from the Clean Air Act for any new drilling area outside the Gulf of Mexico.
  • increases the odds of another oil spill by rejecting requested funds for additional staff and funding for increased facility inspections on offshore drilling rigs.
  • prohibits funding for the Wild Lands Secretarial Order, which Republicans say would negatively impact ranching, energy production, recreation, and other activities on public lands. A similar measure passed the House in the FY 2011 continuing budget resolution.
  • prohibits funding for the EPA to regulate levels of particulate matter in the air, including farm dust, under the Clean Air Act.
  • prohibits funding for the EPA to develop additional financial assurance requirements for hard rock mining operations.
  • prohibits states from receiving EPA Great Lakes funding if they have adopted ballast water requirements that are more stringent than federal requirements.
  • directs the EPA to do a cumulative assessment of the impacts of EPA regulations.
  • prohibits funding for the Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology rule and the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, also called the "Transport" rule, which both require power plants to limit toxic air emissions. Both rules respond to court orders.

The bill is especially damaging to the nation's wildlife says a former head of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Jamie Rappaport Clark, now executive vice president of the nonprofit Defenders of Wildlife, headed the Service from 1997 to 2001 in the Clinton administration.

Today, she called the bill "a Frankenstein's monster of wildlife-killing provisions."

The bill would:

  • stop new protections for animals at risk of extinction and their habitat. Clark says this could be "disastrous" for species like walruses, which are struggling to survive.
  • prevent legal action to challenge Wyoming's shoot-on-sight wolf plan.
  • prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from doing more to protect waters and the wildlife and communities that depend on them. Pesticides are already a major threat to salmon, frogs and other wildlife.
  • reduce grant programs that provide funding to states to protect declining and imperiled species and to other countries to protect migratory species that live in the United States during parts of the year.
  • slash funding for national wildlife refuges, habitat restoration and other key conservation spending. The committee approved billions in spending cuts, which would damage already underfunded refuges and undercut environmental protection.

The Republicans say cutting spending is the most important goal.

Interior Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Mike Simpson said, "We are living at a time of record deficits and debt. If there's one thing we should have learned from the last Congress, it's that we can't spend our way to economic recovery."

Ranking Member Moran points out that "the vast majority of the EPA's funds pass through to states and localities that are already squeezed by budget cuts. These infrastructure projects create jobs in communities all across the country and provide one of the most basic services taxpayers expect: clean water."

全文及圖片詳見:ENS報導

作者

蔡麗伶(LiLing Barricman)

In my healing journey and learning to attain the breath awareness, I become aware of the reality that all the creatures of the world are breathing the same breath. Take action, here and now. From my physical being to the every corner of this out of balance's planet.